Came across two apt examples of the use of data to demonstrate correlation and causation.
“On Orbitz, Mac Users Steered to Pricier Hotels“, WSJ.com
Orbitz has found that people who use Apple Mac computers spend as much as 30% more a night on hotels, so the online travel agency is starting to show them different, and sometimes costlier, travel options than Windows visitors see.
Orbitz executives confirmed that the company is experimenting with showing different hotel offers to Mac and PC visitors, but said the company isn’t showing the same room to different users at different prices. They also pointed out that users can opt to rank results by price.
Orbitz found Mac users on average spend $20 to $30 more a night on hotels than their PC counterparts, a significant margin given the site’s average nightly hotel booking is around $100, chief scientist Wai Gen Yee said. Mac users are 40% more likely to book a four- or five-star hotel than PC users, Mr. Yee said, and when Mac and PC users book the same hotel, Mac users tend to stay in more expensive rooms.
“Private Schooling Myth Debunked“, The Age
Children who attend private primary schools don’t perform any better in NAPLAN tests than their peers at public schools, new research shows. It was the children of a healthy birth weight, who grew up in higher socio-economic circumstances in homes filled with books and had mothers who didn’t work long hours who performed best at NAPLAN.
Children who weighed less than 2.5 kilograms at birth, achieved ”significantly lower” test scores, especially in grammar and numeracy, with the researchers suggesting low birthweight correlated with longer-term developmental delays.
Children whose parents had completed year 12 had higher test scores across all subjects. Students whose mothers worked long hours did worse in all tests except numeracy, yet the working hours of fathers had no impact on test results.
”One explanation for this may be that children of young ages typically spend more time with mothers than fathers,” the authors said.
Like the ideal product practitioner – we’re primarily interested in discovering causation over correlation. You’ll often find instances where two variables show correlation but aren’t linked causally. The latter article wants to say that low birthweight is not the reason behind lower scores on standardized tests. On the other hand, the kind of hours that parents spend with their children do have an impact on how children perform.
The first article on Mac users booking pricier hotels makes the distinction blurry. Is owning a Mac simply correlated to my taste in hotels? Is Orbitz right in assuming that Mac users are less conscious about price to value? Or is there more to it than meets the eye? How you translate this information into your product tells your users a lot about your brand and the difference you see between correlation and causation.